Immigratin Voice Testimony at House Judiciary Committee
Register Get Involved Contact Lawmakers Advocacy Discussion Image Image Image Image
Where We Stand Print E-mail

Pro-Immigrant v/s Pro-Immigration

To explain where Immigration Voice stands, it is important for us to first go over the difference between "Pro-Immigrant" and "Pro-Immigration".

Each one of us has heard many say that “We are a nation of immigrants”. But no matter what our personal belief is, we all acknowledge that immigration is a complicated and difficult subject.

Even though people tend to use these interchangeably, we believe that there is a very important distinction between “pro-immigration” and “pro-immigrant”.

Immigration Voice is a “Pro-Immigrant” organization. That means, our goal is to have immigrants treated fairly, have certain basic rights, so they are not exploited by employers, lawyers, and other institutions. This also helps to prevent depressing wages or the displacement of US workers.

We will not (and never have), advocated to bring in more new immigrants from outside of United States in the current flawed system. Rather, we want that when immigrants come here (or when immigrants are brought here), that they have certain basic rights, which allows them their pursuit of happiness, without interfering with the working conditions of US workers.

Although the two words sound similar, “pro immigrant” is significantly different from “pro-immigration”.

“Pro-immigration” means when someone wants to bring in more immigrants from outside of the United States.

“Pro-immigrant” means to make sure that immigrants are treated fairly and they have certain basic rights so employers are unable to exploit them.

To put things in perspective, here is what we have observed:

Immigration Lawyers are “Pro-Immigration” because they want more new immigrants to be brought into the United States. New immigrants coming into the US mean more business for them. So their position is self-serving. And generally, Immigration Lawyers are “anti-immigrants” because they don’t want skilled immigrants to get certain basic rights, including the right to their own paperwork. We think that Immigration Lawyers believe that if immigrants have more control over the process, then fewer employers will be incentivized to hire more immigrants, which will result in reduced business for immigration lawyers. For a long time, Immigration Lawyers have turned a blind eye to the exploitation and abuse of immigrants by their employers. So Immigration Lawyers are “pro-Immigration” but “anti-immigrant”. But when Immigration Lawyers go to Congress, they pretend as if they speak for and on behalf of “immigrants”, which is not the case, because they only speak for themselves. Immigration Lawyers and their organizations push for more complicated laws and regulations to make sure that everyone who has anything to do with immigration is forced to hire lawyers. That is the primary goal of the lobbying done by immigration lawyers.

Immigration Voice is a “pro-immigrant” organization. We want immigrants to have certain rights including the ability to change employer with as much ease as everyone else in the system, so that immigrant employees are not held captives to their employers. Immigration Voice is a “pro-immigration” organization, but only for a system which is “pro-immigrant” and “pro-US workers”. We have always held that new immigrants should not be brought into the current flawed system because the current system of H-1B and L-1 visa system makes immigrant employees captives of their employers, allowing exploitation of immigrants, who come here to seek freedom and start a new life. This also leads to wage depression and displacement of Americans, which is widely documented. Recent events at companies like Disney & Southern California Edison received widespread media coverage.

A system which is not “pro-immigrant” and that brings in more new immigrants will end up hurting America, Americans, and the new immigrants. That system may work great for a handful of employers and immigration lawyers (as is the case right now), but in the long run, such a system is doomed to fail because it defies the laws of nature.

Companies usually create front groups in Washington to push for their skilled immigration agenda. They usually hire big-name professors to do “research” and “studies” that have a predetermined outcome. These studies are all paid-for and used by the front groups of the tech companies to lobby and push for their agenda. The tech companies want more workers and they use bumper sticker slogans like “if you oppose H-1B/L-1 visa then you are against immigrants”, “H-1B/L-1 immigrants come in and create jobs”, “if you oppose H-1B/L1 visa then you don’t want the next entrepreneur to come and create companies” etc. All of which are mostly nonsense because the fact is that immigrants on H-1B/L-1 visa cannot change jobs. 99.9% of H-1B/L-1 visa holders are unable to start their own business. Almost all of the businesses started by immigrants are after they get their green cards. But companies distort facts about the businesses started by immigrants to push for their H-1B/L-1 agenda. Companies have deep pockets. Apart from extensively lobbying, they conduct several fundraisers and other initiatives to influence policy making. The whole purpose is to ensure that laws/policies cannot be changed to somehow allow skilled immigrants to slip away from their grip. They push for regulations to deny their employees copies of their own paper work file because as per the current system, immigrants require copies of their own paperwork file to change employers. Companies push for laws that will add workers in the system on the pretext that they can’t find more workers here. In essence, companies want to increase immigration, but they don’t want immigrants to get certain basic rights. This is applicable to both, large US tech companies and Indian outsourcing companies.


Immigration Voice is the largest non-profit grassroots organization of skilled immigrants on H-1B and L-1 visa in the United States. We are fiercely opposed to the current H-1B visa program and L-1 visa program because it causes exploitation of skilled immigrants and displacement of US workers. Living in the trenches we know all too well how the system is abused by employers and immigration lawyers to exploit immigrants. Usually, immigration lawyers not only give immigration advice to employers but give business advice to companies on how to use immigrant employee’s immigration status as long-term employee retention insurance policy. The whole system is stacked against the immigrant employees and the US workers.

For the best interest of America and Americans, Immigration Voice 's position is that immigrants ought to be treated fairly and equally when our folks are brought into the US. Because if immigrants are not treated fairly and equally, it makes immigrant workers more attractive to employers over US Workers, which puts US workers at disadvantage in the marketplace.

We believe that if the system doesn't ensure adequate rights to immigrants then it is better to not bring in any immigrants at all or else companies can treat immigrants like indentured servants and lawyers could treat immigrants like fresh meat to make money. If the system doesn't ensure adequate rights for immigrants (including the right to change jobs and employer with as much ease as others in the marketplace), then we would rather have no immigrants be brought into the US at all, otherwise, companies will continue to use immigrants to discriminate against the native population. Rather, we prefer immigrants to live free when they come to the US or wherever they chose to live.

To make it simple to understand who stands where on the overall immigration, here is a table that breaks down different positions. This table has been created based on our experience working with each of these groups and based on our observation about where different groups stand on the overall issues of skilled immigration:

Pro-Immigration v/s Pro-Immigrant

National Advisory Board

Neil Patel Neil Patel
Former Domestic & Economic Policy Advisor to VP
Robert Hoffman Robert Hoffman
Senior Vice President of ITI
Ilya Shapiro Ilya Shapiro
Senior Fellow in Constitutional Studies, CATO Institute



Lost Password?

You are here  :Home arrow About Us arrow Where We Stand


Best Immigration Forums on the Web Visit the Best and most useful Immigration Forums available online.


Track & Analyze the progress of the Green Card applications of others in the community.

Immigration Wiki

Best Immigration Forums on the Web Make use of the largest Immigration Wiki and help create a valuable resource for those who will follow in your footsteps.