Immigration Voice - Forums - Legacy
Register Get Involved Contact Lawmakers Advocacy Discussion Image Image Image Image

Go Back   Immigration Voice > Immigration Voice Issues and Congressional updates > IV Agenda and Legislative Updates
Click to log in with Facebook
IV Agenda and Legislative Updates Immigration Voice's Agenda and Legislative Updates

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-22-2016, 04:43 PM
Aemon.Targ Aemon.Targ is offline
Junior Member
Priority Date
:
Category
:
N/A
I140 Mailed Date
:
Chargeability
:
Processing Stage
:
I485 Mailed Date
:
Compare
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 16
Aemon.Targ is on a distinguished road
Default Another firm which doesn't oppose the new rule.

There you go. One of the famous law firms is not opposing the new Proposed Rule for Changes Affecting EB1, EB2, & EB3, they are just 'deeply disappointed'. Just read the post # 7 from the below link

Your Suggestions for Murthy Law Firm's Comments on Proposed Rule for Changes Affecting EB1, EB2, & EB3 - Topic of the Week - Murthy Law Firm
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #2  
Old 01-22-2016, 05:31 PM
DMX17 DMX17 is offline
Senior Member
Priority Date
:
Jan-11
Category
:
EB2
I140 Mailed Date
:
Chargeability
:
Processing Stage
:
I-140
I485 Mailed Date
:
Compare
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 628
DMX17 is just really nice DMX17 is just really nice DMX17 is just really nice DMX17 is just really nice DMX17 is just really nice
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aemon.Targ View Post
There you go. One of the famous law firms is not opposing the new Proposed Rule for Changes Affecting EB1, EB2, & EB3, they are just 'deeply disappointed'. Just read the post # 7 from the below link

Your Suggestions for Murthy Law Firm's Comments on Proposed Rule for Changes Affecting EB1, EB2, & EB3 - Topic of the Week - Murthy Law Firm
Like I have said....all opinions are the same and they are against immigrants mobility. I can't say their opinon is srictly speaking based on legality of whether something is possible. Just money and self preservation of the immigration law industry.
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #3  
Old 01-23-2016, 09:05 AM
nvedia nvedia is offline
Member
Priority Date
:
Category
:
N/A
I140 Mailed Date
:
Chargeability
:
Processing Stage
:
I485 Mailed Date
:
Compare
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 54
nvedia is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aemon.Targ View Post
There you go. One of the famous law firms is not opposing the new Proposed Rule for Changes Affecting EB1, EB2, & EB3, they are just 'deeply disappointed'. Just read the post # 7 from the below link

Your Suggestions for Murthy Law Firm's Comments on Proposed Rule for Changes Affecting EB1, EB2, & EB3 - Topic of the Week - Murthy Law Firm
Most law firms are not opposing as they are busy doing new I140's, H1B extensions
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I-765 Replacement EAD / I-9 Receipt Rule / 90 Day Unemployment Rule rrarunan Self-filing, documents, forms, directions, mailing. 1 11-18-2010 12:45 PM
Oppose Proposed New CIR goan2005 IV Agenda and Legislative Updates 21 06-20-2007 09:19 PM
Oppose the Fee Increase!! purgan IV Agenda and Legislative Updates 11 03-07-2007 05:28 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 (Unregistered)
(c)ImmigrationVoice.org