PDA

View Full Version : Initial comments for EAD for I140 Regulation


Pages : 1 2 [3]

palciparum
03-03-2016, 02:39 PM
There is a petition going around for EB1C abuse and it comes on forums whenever visa bulletin is out and dates don't move as happened yesterday.

Per that petition and other post on various forums,
"Respected President & Congress members,

We would like to appraise you of a particular area of United States Immigration law that has a huge potential of fraud and misrepresentation along with being unfairly biased in favor of the people who choose to abuse it. We are talking about the Employment-based first preference category EB1C (International Managers). As you are already probably aware, the requirements for eligibility in that category is just a year of overseas managerial experience in a company that conducts business in both US and abroad. We are sure you will agree that compared to the fair and stringent requirements of EB1A (persons of exceptional ability) and EB1B (outstanding researchers), this is a rather simple qualification to prove. Moreover it opens up avenues for fraud and misrepresentation particularly by overseas companies doing business in USA to unfairly take advantage of this simple requirement.

The following example illustrates the fallacy:
Person A (originally from India) has a US masters degree in a STEM field and works for a company in a managerial job that requires a Masters degree and a few years of experience. This person can only file in EB2 category which is badly backlogged.

Person B (originally from India) has a bachelors degree in a STEM field and works for a company in a job that requires a Bachelors degree and a few years of experience. This person can only file in EB3 category which is even more severely backlogged.

In contrast, Person C (originally from India) works as some manager (over a year) in an Indian software company that also conducts business in the USA. This person can file in EB1C and will get preference over Persons A & B. Please note that for Person C, educational qualifications are irrelevant as there is no such requirement and moreover they are determined by the employing company. So potentially a person with a high school diploma can qualify in that category, not to mention that the prospect of frauds opens up exponentially. Contrast this with EB1A (persons of exceptional ability) and EB1B (outstanding researchers). In terms of immigration preference, person C is considered at par with a Nobel Prize worthy scholar (EB1A) or a renowned Researcher in a STEM field (EB1B). I am sure you are able to see the fallacy easily.

With the recent measures taken to curtail fraud in programs like H1B, the perpetrators have increasingly turned to this EB1C category. We would like to request you to kindly take up the matter with the appropriate authorities about this issue and restore some parity in the above categories. Ideally the EB1C category should be abolished or downgraded to a lower preference category.

Request your help with this.
Thanking you in anticipation,

Employment Based Legal Immigrant Community "

How true is this because there is no proof. There is increase in EB1C filing but does that prove abuse?

Some argue some degree of fraud/abuse is in every category - EB-1 or 2 or 3. Report abuse if you see.

Some argue that you may feel its fraud but you need to provide evidence. Others argue that USCIS/DHS should look in to it as how many managers does the country need that filings are increasing so much. Of course they are getting approved as proper paper work is being done.

What can people do about this - to find out the truth?

Because if EB1C fraud is real then julm karne wale se julm sahne wala jyada gunahgaar hota hai!

palciparum
03-03-2016, 04:05 PM
There is a petition going around for EB1C abuse and it comes on forums whenever visa bulletin is out and dates don't move as happened yesterday.

Per that petition and other post on various forums,
"Respected President & Congress members,

We would like to appraise you of a particular area of United States Immigration law that has a huge potential of fraud and misrepresentation along with being unfairly biased in favor of the people who choose to abuse it. We are talking about the Employment-based first preference category EB1C (International Managers). As you are already probably aware, the requirements for eligibility in that category is just a year of overseas managerial experience in a company that conducts business in both US and abroad. We are sure you will agree that compared to the fair and stringent requirements of EB1A (persons of exceptional ability) and EB1B (outstanding researchers), this is a rather simple qualification to prove. Moreover it opens up avenues for fraud and misrepresentation particularly by overseas companies doing business in USA to unfairly take advantage of this simple requirement.

The following example illustrates the fallacy:
Person A (originally from India) has a US masters degree in a STEM field and works for a company in a managerial job that requires a Masters degree and a few years of experience. This person can only file in EB2 category which is badly backlogged.

Person B (originally from India) has a bachelors degree in a STEM field and works for a company in a job that requires a Bachelors degree and a few years of experience. This person can only file in EB3 category which is even more severely backlogged.

In contrast, Person C (originally from India) works as some manager (over a year) in an Indian software company that also conducts business in the USA. This person can file in EB1C and will get preference over Persons A & B. Please note that for Person C, educational qualifications are irrelevant as there is no such requirement and moreover they are determined by the employing company. So potentially a person with a high school diploma can qualify in that category, not to mention that the prospect of frauds opens up exponentially. Contrast this with EB1A (persons of exceptional ability) and EB1B (outstanding researchers). In terms of immigration preference, person C is considered at par with a Nobel Prize worthy scholar (EB1A) or a renowned Researcher in a STEM field (EB1B). I am sure you are able to see the fallacy easily.

With the recent measures taken to curtail fraud in programs like H1B, the perpetrators have increasingly turned to this EB1C category. We would like to request you to kindly take up the matter with the appropriate authorities about this issue and restore some parity in the above categories. Ideally the EB1C category should be abolished or downgraded to a lower preference category.

Request your help with this.
Thanking you in anticipation,

Employment Based Legal Immigrant Community "

How true is this because there is no proof. There is increase in EB1C filing but does that prove abuse?

Some argue some degree of fraud/abuse is in every category - EB-1 or 2 or 3. Report abuse if you see.

Some argue that you may feel its fraud but you need to provide evidence. Others argue that USCIS/DHS should look in to it as how many managers does the country need that filings are increasing so much. Of course they are getting approved as proper paper work is being done.

What can people do about this - to find out the truth?

Because if EB1C fraud is real then julm karne wale se julm sahne wala jyada gunahgaar hota hai!

I am trying to post above but its get posted randomly in between various posts??

RH_93
03-03-2016, 10:24 PM
Administrator2, do you think it will be a good idea to put a small post on IV FB page about all this twitter exchanges, that way people will become more vigilant about all immigration lawyers. I guess not all IV members visit these threads regularly

Dear IV team,

Thanks for your stinging and true to the bone comments on the "rule". Many of us have taken inspiration from your comments and hard work. You had mentioned after your meeting at the WH that there might be a way forward and you were working towards it and the lobbying efforts were part of that...is that still the case or has anything seismic happened that now leads you to believe this rule is garbage and nothing is going to help us waiting folks. I am not sure the sudden burst of twitter exchange was an indication of things coming. Generally your response has been stating the facts and put the morons on ignore. Something changed there....and is a lot more raw than before. Any guidance on next steps and how we can help will be good.

Thank you.

abcdgc
03-06-2016, 03:15 PM
Lawyers are trying to hijack IV's comments

https://twitter.com/cyrusmehta/status/706228763252662273
"Amused @immivoice adopted my Turkey visa idea without attribution in comment, but rail agst lawyers like Don Quixote tilting at windmills"

abcdgc
03-06-2016, 03:25 PM
Gotcher is attacking IV

(see attached screenshot)

abcdgc
03-06-2016, 03:27 PM
And bootlickers are being cheerleaders

(see attached)

Administrator2
03-06-2016, 05:42 PM
Lawyers are trying to hijack IV's comments

https://twitter.com/cyrusmehta/status/706228763252662273
"Amused @immivoice adopted my Turkey visa idea without attribution in comment, but rail agst lawyers like Don Quixote tilting at windmills"

These lawyers some how think that everything we immigrants do, we must somehow take their permission or give them credit for it. If it was possible, these lawyers would patent the word "air" and "oxygen" and hold each one of us on ransom, asking for credit/ransom if we breath.

We are not required to provide this guy or any of these damn lawyers anything. This guy is claiming that we are using his "idea". First of all, this is not his idea, we gave this idea and discussed the same idea with Bush Administration in 2007 and we have record of that. Secondly, what is the point of an idea if one is not willing to follow through? Idea about action is just a figment of imagination. Idea with action is concrete outcome. While these lawyers have not done anything about the growing exploitation of skilled immigrants over the years, we think these lawyers guys are disingenuous and unworthy of any attention.

Last night IV team asked them 6 simple questions. One would believe that these are 6 very simple questions that they should be able to answer. But nah, they have no answer. Why, because they have nothing to show that they are fair bargainers in the system. Over the years, these immigration lawyers have been systematically engaged in screwing and exploiting immigrants by not only giving immigration advice, but rather business advice to employers for how to use immigration status to retain immigrant employees, so immigrants stuck in backlogs are unable to change jobs/employers. These lawyers tell employers to not to give copies of description of your labor certs, copies receipt and approval notices of your I-140. Some employers even don't even give pay stubs or H-1B document to employees. This is all on the advice of immigration lawyers, so immigrant employees cannot change jobs/employers. Then they push for regulations to make sure that I-140 application belong to employer, H-1B application belong to employer, everything belongs to employer, as if immigrants is a dead body and not a living organism. Over the years, such tricks have been played by immigration lawyers and their organization with the rules and regulation, that when you read the rules and regulations, one can easily make out that these sleazy bastards have played tricks with the system.

We know immigration lawyers all too well. They claim ownership for everything. So we will not be surprised if this guy may one day claim that he owns the sunlight. Let him jump up and down. We owe him nothing and let him go to hell.

Administrator2
03-06-2016, 05:49 PM
Gotcher is attacking IV

(see attached screenshot)


This guy gotcher is a piece of art. A few years back he emailed us wanting to "advice" us. We did not even care to respond to such guy because we know these immigration lawyers all too well.

This guy attacks us every few days. Why? Because we refuse to give a flying bleep about him. The guy is probably in his 70s but still crave for attention like a baby. When we respond to his shenanigans, he will immediately call a truce. That is what he did the last time.

Then he recently started a front group that represent the interest of lawyers but make it look like as if they represent immigrants. So he has tried everything, but we still don't give him attention. What else do you expect from him.

We don't think this gotcher is worthy of our our response. Let him bark.

Administrator2
03-06-2016, 06:01 PM
And bootlickers are being cheerleaders

(see attached)


As you pointed, this guy is the biggest boot licker of all times. He is from the group that think immigration lawyers are Gods. This guy is a jerk, and I don't who he is but I am told that he has been writing BS for sometime. These guys are all talk and no action. And if IV speaks up or works on behalf of immigrants, this guy never misses a chance to attack us.

They are talking to each other, pretending to have a discussion to find fault in IV's comments :):):):) imagine that. They don't like our comments because we want immigrants to be free from the grip of immigration lawyers and employers, so this front group finds an phony reason to attack us.

But hey, we never cared for such people. We work on this issue because we know that there are thousands of people out there who want to work with us and understand the bigger picture about how lawyers and immigration lawyers have been screwing all immigrants and Americans, all at the same time. As far as this guy is concerned, he is a disgrace and waste of time.

Administrator2
03-06-2016, 06:08 PM
For IV Members,

We don't know what this "turkey idea" that these jerks are referring too, and neither do we care. Instead of reading the comments and helping to improve (we like constructive criticism), they are attacking IV's comments without even being able to clearly describe the reason.

People like Cyrus seem to think that if you utter the word "immigration", then you should give him credit. The guy is simply over the top. We asked immigration lawyers these simple 6 questions, but they are unwilling (rather unable) to respond.

See if you can draw a response from immigration lawyers for these 6 questions:

https://twitter.com/immivoice/status/706377830381330432


Question 1: Have the current system of long backlogs resulted in increased exploitation of immigrants on H1 and L1 visa?

Question 2: You seem to blog extensively, then why have you NEVER EVER written about the exploitation skilled immigrants on H1/L1 visas?

Question 3: When H1B/L1 immigrants have fewer rights/ability to change employer, are they not more attractive 2 employers over Americans?

Question 4: Have GC backlogs resulted in more pent-up demand for H1/L1 visas because employers can have more control over immigrant employees who cannot change jobs for decades?

Question 5: Thus, has green card backlogs resulted in displacement of US workers? Is this not the reason for why employers want more captive workers on H-1B and L-1 visas, resulting in displacement of Americans?

Question 6: Everyone who is associated with skilled immigration is fully aware of all sorts of exploitation of skilled immigrants on H-1B and L-1 visas, waiting for green cards? Why does not immigration lawyer talk, blog, comment or write articles about the well-known exploitation of skilled immigrants due to lack of job mobility?

GC2022
03-06-2016, 11:30 PM
IV, I hate to say this - I am actually blocked by Greg siskind for asking some questions couple of months back. But today i feel IV has crossed the line. What have you done ? You have made a fool out of yourself and out of all of us. You just ran your foul mouth without evidence ( YOu are probably right), but that does not make for good optics, it doesnt make for good movement building, it doesnt make for good morale of people who are supporting you and it does not show you or me in good color.

I cannot believe i am doing this , but i want to share greg siskind's Response to the Regulation and quote him which might answer some questions you have posed.

Regulations.gov (http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=USCIS-2015-0008-16515)


"This proposal should have been written with the goal of moving as many people as possible in to an
employment-authorized status that provided maximum mobility for immigrant workers. This would be
good for US workers since it would greatly increase the bargaining power of these backlogged immigrant
workers and driven up salaries (which in turn will drive up US worker salaries). And it would be good for
employers who would save the thousands of dollars spent on regular H-1B renewals.
One winner in this proposal is the group of abusive employers who prefer keeping workers in H-1B status
and unable to move to better jobs. Another is USCIS itself which will receive millions and millions in
additional fees by forcing people to unnecessarily maintain H-1B status. "


Administrator2 - if you have a beef with the lawyers, use your personal account to thrash them in your personal capacity. But when you are representing 110k people who also happen to have brains of their own maybe you should watch what you say on public forums. There is absolutely no reason to be cheap/ foul mouthed to make a point as it does nothing to elevate the discussion ( if thats what you want to do ). If you are not articulate enough to answer their questions or ask them valid questions in a dignified manner, give the twitter handle to me.

DMX17
03-07-2016, 12:28 AM
Relax guys.

Because IV is the first one to formally say that the labor statute is broken and impossible to implement "at the time of application and admission" for any long backlogs, I ask no goddamn lawyers should refer to this idea without giving credit to IV. Oops they never will mention this anyway because they have known and agreed not to mention it hush hush. Maybe they are upset that someone brought it up.

If they really wanted they could have written a blog or two on the labor statute or AC21 104(c) one time extension or 204j implementation to make i140 portable. And that would have been more fresh than the rotten turkey. But which lawyer wants to talk about real shit (hurting their pockets) when they can water our mouths with showing us fake turkey legs again again?

Look guys if us immigrants who are not lawyers can poke holes and come up with decent arguments, these master cheaters can do even better than us especially when they claim to give a shit about us. But they won't coz they don't give a shit about us.

Administrator2
03-07-2016, 11:45 AM
IV, I hate to say this - I am actually blocked by Greg siskind for asking some questions couple of months back. But today i feel IV has crossed the line. What have you done ? You have made a fool out of yourself and out of all of us. You just ran your foul mouth without evidence ( YOu are probably right), but that does not make for good optics, it doesnt make for good movement building, it doesnt make for good morale of people who are supporting you and it does not show you or me in good color.

I cannot believe i am doing this , but i want to share greg siskind's Response to the Regulation and quote him which might answer some questions you have posed.

Regulations.gov (http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=USCIS-2015-0008-16515)


"This proposal should have been written with the goal of moving as many people as possible in to an
employment-authorized status that provided maximum mobility for immigrant workers. This would be
good for US workers since it would greatly increase the bargaining power of these backlogged immigrant
workers and driven up salaries (which in turn will drive up US worker salaries). And it would be good for
employers who would save the thousands of dollars spent on regular H-1B renewals.
One winner in this proposal is the group of abusive employers who prefer keeping workers in H-1B status
and unable to move to better jobs. Another is USCIS itself which will receive millions and millions in
additional fees by forcing people to unnecessarily maintain H-1B status. "


Administrator2 - if you have a beef with the lawyers, use your personal account to thrash them in your personal capacity. But when you are representing 110k people who also happen to have brains of their own maybe you should watch what you say on public forums. There is absolutely no reason to be cheap/ foul mouthed to make a point as it does nothing to elevate the discussion ( if thats what you want to do ). If you are not articulate enough to answer their questions or ask them valid questions in a dignified manner, give the twitter handle to me.

So the guy NEVER EVER said anything about exploitation and abuse of skilled immigrants for as long he has existed. The guy has the time to blog about everything under the sun, but has NEVER EVER said anything about exploitation and abuse of skilled immigrants, which is widespread and widely known.

And for years these lawyers have been giving money to their organization that lobbies for the interest of immigration lawyers, which is often against the interest of immigrants. But they pretend that they are working on behalf of immigrants.

With that as a background, for once in his life he mentioned the word "abuse" in his comments probably because he knew that people like you will read his comments, but according to you, Siskind is God because he wrote that 1 phrase once in his life??????

Get real, please. Your response is not proportionate/balanced to the issue at hand.

You think becoz we picked a fight with some meaningless lawyer on twitter, so it is bad optics? How do you know? Maybe that is what we wanted. Maybe that is what we planned for and now we plan to use this for our purpose. Is that possible? What makes bad optics to you, may not be bad optics for someone else. Is that possible?

You seem to portray that "I" have a personal beef with lawyers. Yes, IV leadership has personal beef with the lawyers because immigration lawyers have been screwing our people. Who cares if you as 1 person don't feel exploited and taken advantage off. Majority of our members do feel it that way.

And if you are so good, and you already seem to know what to do, then why don't you start your own organization and work from there. If you were so good, know all, then why would you want to "advice" us, go start your organization. And when you start your organization, and work on this issue for 10 years, and see lawyers sabotage your fixes for a decades, then come back and talk to us about how it feels. We will be right here showing you the same quote from Siskind at that time, and will ask you to settle your beef with lawyers separately.

vikidisi
03-07-2016, 11:59 AM
If there are folks out there that feel that they don't or should not have a 'beef' with immigration lawyers, that is actually a very sad thing. That means that you guys are reading broad level and vague tweets / posts from them and accepting that they are fighting on your behalf. The reality is on the other end of the spectrum.

shyamps
03-07-2016, 12:22 PM
And, If you need more proof that Lawyer groups and crooked Lobbying interests are stabbing us behind our backs, See for yourself the official comments submitted by AILA for the I140 EAD regulation. AILA is the American Immigration Lawyer's association & the largest organisation representing Immigration Lawyers in the United States. In the comments They have submitted to the DHS for I140 EAD, they are basically telling DHS to screw immigrants and interpret the law in such a way that everytime there is a job change, an immigrant must submit and restart the Immigration Green Card process.I am quoting the text here, but you can find all the details in IV's thread: Making fun of AILA Submission on AC21 Reg - Immigration Voice (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/forum16-iv-agenda-and-legislative-updates/3096735-making-fun-of-aila-submission-on-ac21-reg.html).

I am starting this thread to just say: AILA submission is utter bullshit.
Here is my favorite part where AILA wants DHS to put more salt on our wounds:
The population that will be drawn to this proposal is individuals who have an approved immigrant petition but who are unable to apply for adjustment of status due to the long visa backlogs. However, it must be made clear to this population that the beneficiary of an approved employment-based petition must have a valid offer of employment based on a valid petition, and that the applicant must intend to accept such offer of employment at the time of adjusting to permanent resident status (in cases where that option remains available) or entering the U.S. on an immigrant visa. It is assumed that most (c)(36) EAD applicants would be compelled to apply for independent work authorization to change jobs, employers, or even professions, and not to simply stay with their current employer. Therefore, (c)(36) EAD recipients must either have an arrangement with the petitioning employer to resume or assume the position articulated in the approved I-140 petition when the priority date becomes current, or they must make alternative arrangements with a new employer to commence the immigrant visa process anew. Though (c)(36) EAD recipients would be able to retain the priority date from the original petition (unless it is revoked due to fraud, misrepresentation, etc.), they would still need an approved petition with an employer intending to hire them on a permanent basis in order to obtain permanent residence.
Post your comments. Don't be fooled by Giskind or others.

To rebutt what they are asking, i'm quoting the Text from Immigration nationality act passed by Congress that describes how an immigrants status must be adjusted.



INA: ACT 245 - ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS OF NONIMMIGRANT TO THAT OF PERSON ADMITTED FOR PERMANENT RESIDENCE
Sec. 245. [8 U.S.C. 1255]

(a)
The status of an alien who was inspected and admitted or paroled into the United States

1/

or the status of any other alien having an approved petition for classification

may be adjusted by the Attorney General, in his discretion and under such regulations as he may prescribe, to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence if


(1) the alien makes an application for such adjustment,



(2) the alien is eligible to receive an immigrant visa and is admissible to the United States for permanent residence, and


(3) an immigrant visa is immediately available to him at the time his application is filed.

Nowhere in the text passed by Congress (The Highest Authority in this country) does it say that an alien/immigrant must maintain employment with the same original petitioning employer during the entire green card process so he/she can adjust his/her status during the last stage of the process.

Despite this clear language in the act enacted by Congress (The Highest Authority in this country), the people from AILA are the scoundrels who are trying to dictate to DHS to interpret the laws in the way it suits them so they can keep people stuck in green card backlogs forever so their lawyers can preserve their money making racket agenda of charging immigrants and their employers to indefenitely keep renewing their H1B visas to help keep them getting richer at our expense. Who the hell do these AILA people think they are? Creators of this Universe? I hope people are wise enought to see through their deceit and call them out for what they really are, unscrouplous @##@#@!@#!!!! Its time to set this lousy system that exploits immigrants straight!!! Time to join IV and fight this fight!!!:mad:

GC2022
03-07-2016, 12:31 PM
Ofcourse we have an issue with lawyers, Ofcourse the lawyers are screwing us. Ofcourse the lawyers are in it for money.

Infact - please see this document where i call them out publicly. Also, please observe the language i have used to engage. You can see the whole conversation on Murthy.com facebook page on this timestamp, its public.

How does it help by using filthy language ? does it amplify our message? or does it negate the effect of what we are saying? I can tell you that a strong case can be made that it does nothing to further our cause, not even to fully hit them with attacks. This is not attacking them, this is sophomoric pap.

See here

https://paper.dropbox.com/doc/How-to-engage-with-a-lawfirmorganization-professionally-Lessons-for-for-Administrator2.-8IkGv2el0uQuToFvnoDnL

Administrator2
03-07-2016, 02:10 PM
Ofcourse we have an issue with lawyers, Ofcourse the lawyers are screwing us. Ofcourse the lawyers are in it for money.

Infact - please see this document where i call them out publicly. Also, please observe the language i have used to engage. You can see the whole conversation on Murthy.com facebook page on this timestamp, its public.

How does it help by using filthy language ? does it amplify our message? or does it negate the effect of what we are saying? I can tell you that a strong case can be made that it does nothing to further our cause, not even to fully hit them with attacks. This is not attacking them, this is sophomoric pap.

See here

https://paper.dropbox.com/doc/How-to-engage-with-a-lawfirmorganization-professionally-Lessons-for-for-Administrator2.-8IkGv2el0uQuToFvnoDnL


Different forums/tools are for different purposes. You don't change policy over twitter. Twitter is for shock and awe. Some get it, others don't. We don't want to engage with law firms. We think they are bunch of thieves and thugs. You can engage with them. We prefer to go to the Congress to tell staffers what these guys do. That is more effective. We don't plan to appeal to their better nature. We think they are thugs, and they will always be thugs.

DCToGC
03-07-2016, 03:00 PM
Administrator2, do you think it will be a good idea to put a small post on IV FB page about all this twitter exchanges, that way people will become more vigilant about all immigration lawyers. I guess not all IV members visit these threads regularly

DCToGC
03-31-2016, 03:34 PM
Hi, received following email from USCIS sometime ago today, can someone please tell whether this is related to much anticipated AC21 regulation.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
The following Federal Register Notice is now available:

Agency Information Collection Activities: Application To Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status, Form I-485, and Adjustment of Status Under Section 245(i), Supplement A to Form I-485; Revision of a Currently Approved Collection

Action: 60-day notice

March 31, 2016

FR DOC# 2016-07265

https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2016-03-31/html/2016-07265.htm
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

right2niru
03-31-2016, 07:27 PM
Hi, received following email from USCIS sometime ago today, can someone please tell whether this is related to much anticipated AC21 regulation.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
The following Federal Register Notice is now available:

Agency Information Collection Activities: Application To Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status, Form I-485, and Adjustment of Status Under Section 245(i), Supplement A to Form I-485; Revision of a Currently Approved Collection

Action: 60-day notice

March 31, 2016

FR DOC# 2016-07265

https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2016-03-31/html/2016-07265.htm
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

I tried to read and comprehend 3 times however am not sure what is this request for and how are USCIS directly sending individuals instead of the petitioners ?

GCBuyer
03-31-2016, 08:02 PM
I have not contributed much for the cause and I am ashamed of it. I am an active IV donor. From 30 thousand feet, I can tell that IV leadership need to mature on public relation skills to mobilize people. For the cause IV stand for, I believe it is one of the onus IV carries.

I am speaking out my heart and mind of naive (general immigrant community). Hence I believe my statement carries larger weight.